Using the ICE table the other way
U7.4 found K from equilibrium data; this lesson goes the other way, using K and the initial concentrations to find the equilibrium concentrations:
- Set up an ICE table, writing each change in terms of x (coefficient × x);
- Substitute the E row into the K expression to get an equation in x only;
- Solve for x, then calculate each equilibrium concentration;
- Substitute back and check that Q equals K.
Three ways to solve
Square root. When both sides are perfect squares (for example, Δn = 0 and the two reactants start at the same concentration), take the square root; no approximation is needed.
The “small x” approximation. When K is small, hardly any reactant is used up, so c₀ − x ≈ c₀ and the equation becomes much simpler. Once you have x, check it: the approximation is acceptable only if x is no more than 5% of c₀.
The quadratic formula. When the approximation fails, rearrange to ax² + bx + c = 0 and use the quadratic formula. Only one of the two roots makes sense: the one that keeps every equilibrium concentration from being negative (usually 0 < x < c₀).
Choose a reaction, drag the initial concentration, and compare the approximate and exact solutions:
Example 1: Taking a square root
At 800 °C, CO(g) + H₂O(g) ⇌ CO₂(g) + H₂(g) has K = 0.640. Initially [CO] = [H₂O] = 0.100 M, with no products. Find the equilibrium concentrations.
-
Decide the direction. There are no products at the start, so Q = 0 < K and the reaction runs forward: CO and H₂O decrease, CO₂ and H₂ increase.
-
Set up an ICE table. All four coefficients are 1, so every change is x (concentrations in M):
CO H₂O CO₂ H₂ I 0.100 0.100 0 0 C −x −x +x +x E 0.100 − x 0.100 − x x x -
Substitute the equilibrium row into K.
-
Take the square root of both sides. Both sides are perfect squares, so the square root turns this into a linear equation, and no quadratic is needed:
-
Solve for x.
-
Find the equilibrium concentrations. [H₂] equals [CO₂], and [H₂O] equals [CO]:
-
Check by substituting back. Put the equilibrium concentrations back into the K expression:
The small difference comes from rounding, so the answer is right.
Example 2: When the approximation fails
At 25 °C, N₂O₄(g) ⇌ 2NO₂(g) has K = 6.3 × 10⁻³. Initially [N₂O₄] = 0.0200 M. Find [NO₂] at equilibrium.
-
Set up an ICE table. Only N₂O₄ is present at the start, so the reaction runs forward. N₂O₄ decreases by x, and NO₂ increases by 2x, following the coefficients (concentrations in M):
N₂O₄ 2NO₂ I 0.0200 0 C −x +2x E 0.0200 − x 2x -
Substitute the equilibrium row into K. [NO₂] is 2x, so the 2 is squared as well:
-
Try the approximation first. Assume x ≪ 0.0200, so the denominator is 0.0200:
-
Test the approximation. Express x as a percentage of the starting concentration:
That is far more than 5%, so the approximation fails and the full equation must be solved.
-
Rearrange into a quadratic. Multiply both sides by (0.0200 − x), then move every term to one side (keep the letter K for now and substitute its value at the end):
-
Use the quadratic formula. Matching ax² + bx + c = 0: a = 4, b = K = 6.3 × 10⁻³ and c = −0.0200K = −1.26 × 10⁻⁴.
The other root (with the “−” sign) is negative; it would make [NO₂] negative, so it is rejected.
-
Find the equilibrium concentrations.
-
Check by substituting back. Use the unrounded x = 4.88 × 10⁻³:
- HA ⇌ H⁺ + A⁻, Ka = 1.8 × 10⁻⁵, c₀ = 0.10 M
x ≈ 1.3 × 10⁻³, or 1.3%.
- HA ⇌ H⁺ + A⁻, Ka = 6.4 × 10⁻⁴, c₀ = 0.010 M
x ≈ 2.5 × 10⁻³, or 25%.
- HA ⇌ H⁺ + A⁻, Ka = 6.4 × 10⁻⁴, c₀ = 1.0 M
x ≈ 0.025, or 2.5%.
- HA ⇌ H⁺ + A⁻, Ka = 4.9 × 10⁻¹⁰, c₀ = 0.0010 M
x ≈ 7 × 10⁻⁷, or 0.07%.
- N₂ + O₂ ⇌ 2NO, K = 4.1 × 10⁻⁴, with N₂ and O₂ both starting at 0.50 M
x is about 1%.
- N₂O₄ ⇌ 2NO₂, K = 6.3 × 10⁻³, c₀ = 0.010 M
x ≈ 4.0 × 10⁻³, or 40%.
- N₂O₄ ⇌ 2NO₂, K = 6.3 × 10⁻³, c₀ = 1.0 M
x ≈ 0.040, or 4%: just acceptable.
- HA ⇌ H⁺ + A⁻, Ka = 1.8 × 10⁻⁴, c₀ = 0.0050 M
x ≈ 9.5 × 10⁻⁴, or 19%.
Common mistakes
Mistake 1: “Whenever K is less than 1, the approximation works.” Whether the approximation works depends on the ratio of x to c₀, which you have to calculate and check. When K isn’t very small and c₀ is small, the approximation can be far off.
Mistake 2: “(2x)² is the same as 2x².” (2x)² = 4x². A substance with coefficient 2 has concentration 2x, and the whole 2x is squared.
Mistake 3: “Either root of the quadratic will do.” Only the root that keeps every concentration from being negative makes sense. Reject a negative root or one larger than c₀.
Quick check
Solving x² ÷ (0.10 − x) = 0.50 gives two roots: x = 0.085 and x = −0.59. What is x at equilibrium?
x is the amount of reactant used up, so it must be positive and less than 0.10.
Starting from pure HI, 2HI(g) ⇌ H₂(g) + I₂(g), with [HI]₀ = c₀ and H₂ increasing by x. Which is the equation for K?
Forming x of H₂ uses 2x of HI, so [HI] = c₀ − 2x, and the denominator of the expression is [HI]².
A(g) + B(g) ⇌ C(g) + D(g) has K = 9.0. Initially [A] = [B] = 1.0 M, with no C or D. What is [C] at equilibrium?
x² ÷ (1.0 − x)² = 9.0; taking square roots, x ÷ (1.0 − x) = 3.0, so x = 0.75.
X(g) ⇌ 2Y(g) has K = 1.0 × 10⁻⁶, and initially [X] = 0.25 M. [Y] at equilibrium is about:
(2x)² ÷ 0.25 ≈ 1.0 × 10⁻⁶, so x ≈ 2.5 × 10⁻⁴ and [Y] = 2x = 5.0 × 10⁻⁴ M. A is x, not [Y].
The approximation gives x = 0.012 M, and the initial concentration is c₀ = 0.10 M. What should you do?
x ÷ c₀ = 12%, more than 5%, so the approximation isn’t reliable.
Which situation can be solved by taking a square root, with no approximation?
(2x)² ÷ (c₀ − x)² is a perfect square; taking square roots gives 2x ÷ (c₀ − x) = √K.
AP-style free response
At 2000 °C, N₂(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2NO(g) has K = 4.1 × 10⁻⁴ (OpenStax). A reactor starts with [N₂] = 0.040 M and [O₂] = 0.010 M (close to the ratio in air) and no NO.
(a) Set up an ICE table.
(b) Write the equation for x.
(c) Use an approximation to find [NO] at equilibrium.
(d) Check whether the approximation in (c) is acceptable.
(e) This reaction has ΔH = +180.6 kJ/mol (from NBS enthalpies of formation). If the reaction were run at a lower temperature, would [NO] at equilibrium be larger or smaller? Justify your answer.
Model answer and scoring
(a) I: 0.040, 0.010, 0; C: −x, −x, +2x; E: 0.040 − x, 0.010 − x, 2x.
(b) (2x)² ÷ [(0.040 − x)(0.010 − x)] = 4.1 × 10⁻⁴.
(c) Approximating 0.040 − x ≈ 0.040 and 0.010 − x ≈ 0.010: 4x² ÷ (4.0 × 10⁻⁴) = 4.1 × 10⁻⁴, so x² = 4.1 × 10⁻⁸, x = 2.0 × 10⁻⁴, and [NO] = 2x = 4.0 × 10⁻⁴ M.
(d) x ÷ 0.010 = 2%, which is under 5%, so the approximation is acceptable (the exact solution is also 4.0 × 10⁻⁴ M).
(e) Smaller. The forward reaction is endothermic, so lowering the temperature decreases K, and less NO forms at equilibrium.
Scoring: (a) ICE table; (b) the equation; (c) solving with the approximation; (d) the 5% check against the smaller initial concentration; (e) K decreases on cooling for an endothermic reaction.
Summary
- Given K and initial concentrations: ICE table → equation in x → solve for x → equilibrium concentrations → check by substituting back.
- Take a square root for a perfect square; use c₀ − x ≈ c₀ when K is small, checking that x is no more than 5% of c₀; otherwise solve the quadratic.
- Keep only the root that makes every concentration non-negative.
AP tip: Whenever you use an approximation, show the check (“x/c₀ = …% < 5%”). The AP exam rarely requires the quadratic formula; most questions can be solved with a square root or an approximation that works. When the approximation fails, say so.