Why it shifts: look at Q and K
Le Châtelier’s principle tells you which way an equilibrium shifts; Q and K tell you why. At equilibrium Q = K; after a change, as long as Q ≠ K, the reaction proceeds until Q equals K again.
- Changing a concentration changes Q. Adding a reactant (larger denominator) or removing a product (smaller numerator) makes Q < K, so the reaction proceeds forward.
- Changing the volume changes every gas concentration by the same factor. Halving the volume doubles each gas concentration and multiplies Q by 2Δn (Δn = gas moles of products − gas moles of reactants). When Δn < 0, Q decreases and the reaction proceeds forward; when Δn = 0, Q doesn’t change.
- Changing the temperature leaves the concentrations, and so Q, unchanged; K changes instead. If the forward reaction is endothermic, heating increases K, so Q < K and the reaction proceeds forward.
- A catalyst or an inert gas at constant volume changes neither Q nor K.
At the particle level: after a reactant is added, reactant molecules collide more often, so the forward rate rises first and the net reaction goes forward until the two rates are equal again (U7.2).
Apply a change and watch where Q and K sit on the number line:
Example 1: Adding a reactant
At 800 °C, CO(g) + H₂O(g) ⇌ CO₂(g) + H₂(g) has K = 0.640, and at equilibrium [CO] = [H₂O] = 0.111 M and [CO₂] = [H₂] = 0.0889 M. At constant volume, CO is added so that [CO] instantly becomes 0.211 M. Use Q to decide which way the equilibrium shifts, then find [CO] at the new equilibrium.
-
Calculate Q after the change. Only [CO] has changed; the other concentrations are unchanged for the moment:
-
Compare Q with K. Q = 0.337 < K = 0.640: the denominator (reactants) is relatively too large, so the reaction proceeds forward.
-
Set up an ICE table. Start from the concentrations right after CO is added, and let x more react (concentrations in M):
CO H₂O CO₂, H₂ I 0.211 0.111 0.0889 C −x −x +x E 0.211 − x 0.111 − x 0.0889 + x -
Substitute into K.
The numerator and denominator are not squares of the same expression, so a square root won’t work; expand into a quadratic instead.
-
Expand and rearrange. Multiply both sides by the denominator. The left side, (0.0889 + x)², expands to x² + 0.178x + 0.00790; the right side, 0.640(0.211 − x)(0.111 − x) = 0.640(x² − 0.322x + 0.0234), expands to 0.640x² − 0.206x + 0.0150:
Move everything to the left side:
-
Use the quadratic formula. a = 0.360, b = 0.384 and c = −0.00709:
The other root is large and negative and would make concentrations negative, so it is rejected.
-
Find the new equilibrium concentrations (in M). [H₂] equals [CO₂]:
-
Check by substituting back.
-
Conclusion. At the new equilibrium [CO] = 0.193 M: lower than right after the addition (0.211 M) but still higher than at the original equilibrium (0.111 M). The shift only partly counteracts the change; it cannot undo it completely.
Example 2: Halving the volume
At 25 °C, N₂O₄(g) ⇌ 2NO₂(g) is at equilibrium with K = 6.3 × 10⁻³. The volume is suddenly compressed to half. What does Q become, and which way does the equilibrium shift?
-
How the concentrations change. At the instant of compression the amounts haven’t changed but the volume is halved, so every gas concentration doubles:
-
Q after compression. Substitute the doubled concentrations, where [ ] means the original equilibrium values:
-
Substitute the value of K.
-
Compare Q with K. Q = 2K > K: there is relatively too much product, so the reaction proceeds in reverse: NO₂ decreases and N₂O₄ increases until Q is back to K.
-
The general rule. When the volume is halved, Q is multiplied by 2Δn, where Δn is the change in gas coefficients (products − reactants). Here Δn = 2 − 1 = +1, so Q doubles. This agrees with “compressing shifts toward fewer gas moles,” but now with a quantitative reason.
- Add O₂
The denominator gets larger.
- Add SO₃
The numerator gets larger.
- Halve the volume
Δn = 2 − 3 = −1, so Q is multiplied by 2⁻¹.
- Double the volume
Q is multiplied by (½)⁻¹ = 2.
- Raise the temperature
The forward reaction is exothermic, so heating lowers K.
- Lower the temperature
Cooling an exothermic reaction raises K.
- Add a catalyst
Neither Q nor K changes.
- Add argon at constant volume
No concentration changes.
Common mistakes
Mistake 1: “Whenever the total pressure rises, the equilibrium shifts toward fewer gas moles.” Only changes in the concentrations (partial pressures) of the reacting species affect Q. Adding an inert gas at constant volume raises the total pressure, but Q is unchanged and there is no shift.
Mistake 2: “Heating changes Q.” At the instant of heating the concentrations haven’t changed, so Q is the same; K is what changes.
Mistake 3: “Changing a concentration changes K.” Concentrations change only Q. K changes only with temperature.
Quick check
A(g) ⇌ 2B(g) is at equilibrium. The volume is compressed to 1/3. At that instant, Q is how many times K?
Every concentration is multiplied by 3, so Q = (3[B])² ÷ (3[A]) = 3 × [B]²/[A]; that is, Q is multiplied by 3Δn with Δn = +1.
A reaction has an endothermic forward reaction. After the temperature is raised and equilibrium is re-established, compared with the original equilibrium:
Heating an endothermic reaction increases K; the old Q is less than the new K, so the reaction proceeds forward.
H₂(g) + I₂(g) ⇌ 2HI(g) is at equilibrium. After the volume is doubled, which statement is correct?
Δn = 0, so Q is unchanged and there is no shift; but doubling the volume halves every concentration.
Some product is removed from a system at equilibrium. At that instant, the forward and reverse rates:
The reactant concentrations haven’t changed, so the forward rate is the same; with less product the reverse rate drops, so the net reaction goes forward.
Which change alters K?
Only temperature changes K.
N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) ⇌ 2NH₃(g) is at equilibrium. The volume is halved. At that instant, Q becomes:
Δn = 2 − 4 = −2, so Q is multiplied by 2⁻² = 1/4. Q < K, so the reaction proceeds forward, forming NH₃.
AP-style free response
At a certain temperature, 2SO₂(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2SO₃(g) is at equilibrium in a container with [SO₂] = 0.20 M, [O₂] = 0.10 M, and [SO₃] = 0.40 M. For the forward reaction, ΔH = −197.8 kJ/mol (from NBS enthalpies of formation).
(a) Calculate K at this temperature.
(b) At constant temperature, the volume is suddenly compressed to half. Calculate Q at that instant and determine the direction of reaction.
(c) Explain the direction in (b) in terms of the forward and reverse rates.
(d) If the temperature were raised instead, would Q or K change? Which way would the equilibrium shift?
(e) More O₂ is added to the original equilibrium. How does the fraction of SO₂ converted change? Justify your answer.
Model answer and scoring
(a) K = 0.40² ÷ (0.20² × 0.10) = 0.16 ÷ 0.0040 = 40.
(b) Every concentration doubles: Q = 0.80² ÷ (0.40² × 0.20) = 0.64 ÷ 0.032 = 20 < 40, so the reaction proceeds forward.
(c) After compression all concentrations double. The forward rate depends on [SO₂]²[O₂] (if treated as elementary, it grows 8 times), while the reverse rate depends on [SO₃]² (it grows 4 times). The forward rate increases more, so the net reaction goes forward.
(d) K changes; Q doesn’t. The forward reaction is exothermic, so heating lowers K, making Q > K, and the equilibrium shifts in reverse.
(e) It increases. More O₂ makes Q < K, so the equilibrium shifts forward and more SO₂ is converted to SO₃.
Scoring: (a) K; (b) comparing Q with K; (c) comparing the rates; (d) temperature changes K; (e) adding another reactant raises the conversion.
Summary
- Changes in concentration or volume change only Q; when Q ≠ K, the reaction proceeds until Q = K.
- Halving the volume multiplies Q by 2Δn; when Δn = 0, changing the volume doesn’t shift the equilibrium.
- Temperature changes only K: heating raises K for an endothermic reaction and lowers it for an exothermic one.
- Catalysts and inert gases at constant volume change neither Q nor K.
AP tip: To explain which way an equilibrium shifts and why, use three steps: which quantity changed (Q or K) → how Q now compares with K → therefore the direction of reaction. This earns more credit than “by Le Châtelier’s principle” alone.